<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Difference results legacy and a new version platform]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello.</p>
<p dir="auto">Why is there a difference in the strategy results on the legacy version of the Quantciacs and on the new version?<br />
The strategy is the same.</p>
]]></description><link>http://quantiacs.com/community/topic/3/difference-results-legacy-and-a-new-version-platform</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 04:08:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://quantiacs.com/community/topic/3.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:13:45 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Difference results legacy and a new version platform on Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:49:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="http://quantiacs.com/community/uid/5">@vyacheslav_b</a> Hello, we are using a different slippage model. In the old version of Quantiacs slippage is taken to be 5% (HIGH-LOW). In the new version we use 4% (ATR_14), where ATR_14 is the average true range over the last 14 trading days, and therefore it includes day-to-day price moves in addition to the intraday variation.</p>
]]></description><link>http://quantiacs.com/community/post/15</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://quantiacs.com/community/post/15</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[support]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:49:51 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>