<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[How to select and combine strategies to optimize your portfolio]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello everyone, currently I am looking for a way to select and combine strategies to create a portfolio with effective out samples. I would like to ask:</p>
<p dir="auto">Selection: Besides choosing strategies with high sharpness, low correlation, low turnover, high return, and low drawdown, are there any other criteria to be able to choose more effective strategies?</p>
<p dir="auto">Combine: Besides using equal weight, are there any other effective ways to combine? If so, please give me more documents.</p>
<p dir="auto">Testing: Is there any way to test the quality of the portfolio (Aside from comparing it with equal weight)</p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you</p>
]]></description><link>http://quantiacs.com/community/topic/505/how-to-select-and-combine-strategies-to-optimize-your-portfolio</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 10:07:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://quantiacs.com/community/topic/505.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2024 09:50:02 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How to select and combine strategies to optimize your portfolio on Mon, 22 Jan 2024 04:47:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="http://quantiacs.com/community/uid/12">@support</a>. Thank you. So as I understand it, I will give higher weight to strategies with lower correlation and vice versa, right? According to your answer, I understand that I can also give high weight to low-volatility strategies and vice versa. So what about equal risk portfolio? In your opinion, is this an effective way to optimize your portfolio?</p>
]]></description><link>http://quantiacs.com/community/post/1359</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://quantiacs.com/community/post/1359</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[illustrious.felice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 04:47:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How to select and combine strategies to optimize your portfolio on Sun, 21 Jan 2024 19:31:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="http://quantiacs.com/community/uid/2784">@illustrious-felice</a> Hi, it is not easy for a single strategy to fulfill all the requirements you ask in the selection phase. These are all important criteria.</p>
<p dir="auto">As the Sharpe ratio is the ratio of the mean return (in the numerator) and the volatility (in the denominator), equal weights are not always the best option: correlations have a strong impact when it comes to combining the volatilities of different systems.</p>
]]></description><link>http://quantiacs.com/community/post/1358</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://quantiacs.com/community/post/1358</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[support]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2024 19:31:24 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>