<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Backtester Versions]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello, I started using the backtester some time ago, now I see that you added some option for preserving the state, and another version optimized for machine learning. Honestly I am a little bit confused, which version should I use? Is there a preferred choice?</p>
]]></description><link>http://quantiacs.com/community/topic/66/backtester-versions</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:39:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://quantiacs.com/community/topic/66.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2021 11:03:07 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Backtester Versions on Thu, 20 May 2021 16:55:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="http://quantiacs.com/community/uid/8">@jeppe_and</a> Hi, there are 4 options for backtesting:</p>
<ul>
<li>processing all data in one pass. Very fast but you risk to overfit (by taking a global average for example);</li>
<li>processing all data in many passes using the built-in backtester;</li>
<li>same, but preserving the state at each iteration; for example, you can use the weights of yesterday to fix the weights today. In this case submission will take longer as parallelization is not possible;</li>
<li>if yo use machine learning methods and you need to retrain your model periodically, you can use the ml extension for the call to the backtester.</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>http://quantiacs.com/community/post/295</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://quantiacs.com/community/post/295</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[support]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2021 16:55:15 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>