<![CDATA[I built Pogi. Then “just use less risk” nearly killed it. 😂]]>

<![CDATA[I built Pogi. Then “just use less risk” nearly killed it. 😂]]>Pogi decides whether a long-only portfolio should run full risk, half risk, or sit out. Then the dumb benchmark walked in and basically said:

“Have you tried just using less risk?”

Annoyingly, that was hard to beat. So I wrote the result up instead of pretending the controller won. If you build systematic strategies, I want the hostile read. What would you attack first: the controller, the benchmarks, or the inference?

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-10797229/latest

]]>http://quantiacs.com/community/topic/849/i-built-pogi-then-just-use-less-risk-nearly-killed-itRSS for NodeWed, 30 Sep 2026 08:35:51 GMTWed, 30 Sep 2026 06:14:52 GMT60