@omohyoid Dear omohyoid,

Yes, that's right. After submitting your strategy shouldn't override environment variables.

Regards

@vyacheslav_b Thank you so much.

I have one more question for you to answer. I ran the precheck and the result was nan value the first time, but I set the min_date to 2005 - 01 - 01. I would like to ask, why is there a nan value problem? Is it because the ticker I chose had some companies that weren't listed at that time? My strategy id code is # 16767242. Thank you so much

Screenshot 2024-04-09 173002.png
Screenshot 2024-04-09 173012.png

@theflyingdutchman Yes, we are integrating new data sources for a new asset class, once we are done (next week) the data and leaderboard updates will start again.

@support Thank you !

@sun-73 @RoyPalo, Hi,

Q23 Leaderboard was updated several days ago, all eligible submissions are there now, sorry for late notice. Please let us know if you find any submission that is missing.

@support Thank you so much. I have resolved this error

@vg2001 Hello, the Q19 is a replica of the Q18, you ccan use the same examples.

It's safe to ignore these notices but if they bother you, you can set the variables together with your API key using the defaults and the messages go away:

import os os.environ['API_KEY'] = 'YOUR-API-KEY' os.environ['DATA_BASE_URL'] = 'https://data-api.quantiacs.io/' os.environ['CACHE_RETENTION'] = '7' os.environ['CACHE_DIR'] = 'data-cache'

@support
Thanks a lot !

@cyan-gloom

Hello. The provided code is insufficient to understand the problem.

I assume that a certain function might not be returning the required value (for instance, the function where your model is being created).

I recommend that you check all return values of functions, using tools like display or print. Then, compare them with what is returned in properly working examples.

The state allows you to use data from previous iterations. You can find an example here:
https://github.com/quantiacs/toolbox/blob/2f4c42e33c7ce789dfad5d170444fd542e28c8ae/qnt/examples/004-strategy-futures-multipass-stateful.py

@support Got it, thanks a lot!

@johback

Hello

More examples are here https://github.com/quantiacs/toolbox/blob/main/qnt/tests/test_fundamental_data.py

This is a simple example.

import qnt.data as qndata import datetime as dt import qnt.data.secgov_indicators import qnt.data as qndata import qnt.stats as qns assets = qndata.stocks.load_ndx_list(tail=dt.timedelta(days=5 * 365)) assets_names = [i["id"] for i in assets] data = qndata.stocks.load_ndx_data(tail=dt.timedelta(days=5 * 365), dims=("time", "field", "asset"), assets=assets_names, forward_order=True) facts_names = ['operating_expense'] # 'assets', 'liabilities', 'ivestment_short_term' and other fundamental_data = qnt.data.secgov_load_indicators(assets, time_coord=data.time, standard_indicators=facts_names) # Operating expenses include marketing, noncapitalized R&D, # travel and entertainment, office supply, rent, salary, cogs... weights = fundamental_data.sel(field='operating_expense') is_liquid = data.sel(field="is_liquid") weights = weights * is_liquid # calc stats stats = qns.calc_stat(data, weights.sel(time=slice("2006-01-01", None))) display(stats.to_pandas().tail()) # graph performance = stats.to_pandas()["equity"] import qnt.graph as qngraph qngraph.make_plot_filled(performance.index, performance, name="PnL (Equity)", type="log")

@theflyingdutchman Hello, before the end of the week the update will be ready, sorry for the delay

@nosaai Hello

Spyder should be run under conda environment

conda activate qntdev conda install spyder spyder

an alternative way is to clone the library from https://github.com/quantiacs/toolbox
and develop strategies inside qnt. But I recommend using the approach from the documentation.

@pink-seel Super that you found it, please do not hesitate to ask for support!

@eddiee Hi, Mr. Eddie.

I am new to building strategies using ML/DL on Quantiacs and am very impressed with the OS performance of your ML strategies. I hope you can give me your contact (mail, limkedin,...) so I can learn from your experience in building an ML/DL strategy.

Sincerely thank.

@multi_byte-wildebeest Hello. I don't use machine learning models in trading.

@support

This is a possible fix, but no gurantee. You have to adjust also the prediction function.

def train_model(data):
"""Create and train the models working on an asset-by-asset basis."""

models = dict()

asset_name_all = data.coords['asset'].values

data = data.sel(time=slice('2013-05-01',None)) # cut the noisy data head before 2013-05-01

features_all = get_features(data)
target_all = get_target_classes(data)

model = create_model()

for asset_name in asset_name_all:

# drop missing values: target_cur = target_all.sel(asset=asset_name).dropna('time', 'any') features_cur = features_all.sel(asset=asset_name).dropna('time', 'any') # align features and targets: target_for_learn_df, feature_for_learn_df = xr.align(target_cur, features_cur, join='inner') if len(features_cur.time) < 10: # not enough points for training continue try: model.fit(feature_for_learn_df.values, target_for_learn_df) models[asset_name] = model except KeyboardInterrupt as e: raise e except: logging.exception('model training failed')

return models

@support
Thanks.
You guys are the best!🏆

@magenta-grimer There are 2 things you might want to change:

1: the lookback_period is 365 but you want a 400-day SMA. This will only produce NaNs, so the boolean array sma20 < sma20_crypto will be False everywhere resulting in -1 weights. 2*365 as lookback does the trick for these settings.

2: Bitcoin is trading 24/7, futures aren't. Better use crypto.time.values instead of futures.time.values for the output of load_data.

There might be something else that I didn't catch but the resulting sharpe is at least close to what would be expected (1.109 with 5 and 385)