Navigation

    Quantiacs Community

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • News
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All categories
    • Support
    •      Request New Features
    • Strategy help
    • General Discussion
    • News and Feature Releases
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • A

      Q23 should be running now, but not able to join, right?
      Support • • angusslq

      5
      0
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      2960
      Views

      support

      @green-flareon Thanks. The live phase of the Q23 is running. Quants can join any contest during the submission phase. Q24 is on.

    • L

      Fundamental data loading does not work
      Support • • lookman

      5
      0
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      1855
      Views

      V

      @lookman Hello. Try cloning your strategy and running it again. It should work correctly with the new version of the qnt library.

      import qnt.data as qndata import qnt.data.secgov_fundamental as fundamental market_data = qndata.stocks.load_spx_data(min_date="2005-01-01") indicators_data = fundamental.load_indicators_for(market_data, indicator_names=['roe']) display(indicators_data.sel(field="roe").to_pandas().tail(2)) display(indicators_data.sel(asset='NAS:AAPL').to_pandas().tail(2)) display(indicators_data.sel(asset=['NAS:AAPL']).sel(field="roe").to_pandas().tail(2))

      https://quantiacs.com/documentation/en/data/fundamental.html

    • R

      I cant not find my strategy in Q23 leaderboard
      Support • • RoyPalo

      5
      0
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      2384
      Views

      support

      @sun-73 @RoyPalo, Hi,

      Q23 Leaderboard was updated several days ago, all eligible submissions are there now, sorry for late notice. Please let us know if you find any submission that is missing.

    • C

      Setup an environment at Google Colab
      Support • • cortezkwan

      5
      2
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      934
      Views

      C

      @support Great help! Thank you so much!

    • A

      Futures contests and BTC??
      Support • • anthony_m

      4
      1
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      1325
      Views

      support

      @anthony_m we patched with spot BTC data see answer: https://quantiacs.com/community/topic/6/btc-contest-start-date

    • R

      example not accepted as submission
      Support • • rezhak21

      4
      1
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      1097
      Views

      support

      @rezhak21 Rules are defined at: https://quantiacs.com/contest and more details for the current contests (submission time till end of May) can be found at: https://quantiacs.com/contest/15

      For Futures the in sample period starts on January 1st 2006, for the BTC Futures on January 1st, 2014

    • A

      Unable to see 15/16 of myu strategies
      Support • • anshul96go

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      949
      Views

      support

      @captain-nidoran hi, all your strategies which will take part to the contest should be under the "In Contest" tab in the "Competition" section.

      The migration "Candidates" -> "In Contest" was not immediate as we released minor improvements to the front-end side once the submission phase was over.

    • N

      SMA Example
      Support • • Nikos84

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      625
      Views

      N

      @support Thank you!

    • C

      Different dataset locally and in jupiterLab
      Support • • cross_platform.zebra

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      542
      Views

      support

      @cross_platform-zebra Hi, there is no other limitation regarding local development. It is already configured to be exactly the same datasets for Nasdaq100 stocks, and returns the same statistics for trading system running locally or online.

    • E

      Q17 Machine learning - RidgeRegression (Long/Short); there is an error in the code
      Strategy help • • EDDIEE

      4
      1
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      1328
      Views

      E

      @support

      This is a possible fix, but no gurantee. You have to adjust also the prediction function.

      def train_model(data):
      """Create and train the models working on an asset-by-asset basis."""

      models = dict()

      asset_name_all = data.coords['asset'].values

      data = data.sel(time=slice('2013-05-01',None)) # cut the noisy data head before 2013-05-01

      features_all = get_features(data)
      target_all = get_target_classes(data)

      model = create_model()

      for asset_name in asset_name_all:

      # drop missing values: target_cur = target_all.sel(asset=asset_name).dropna('time', 'any') features_cur = features_all.sel(asset=asset_name).dropna('time', 'any') # align features and targets: target_for_learn_df, feature_for_learn_df = xr.align(target_cur, features_cur, join='inner') if len(features_cur.time) < 10: # not enough points for training continue try: model.fit(feature_for_learn_df.values, target_for_learn_df) models[asset_name] = model except KeyboardInterrupt as e: raise e except: logging.exception('model training failed')

      return models

    • J

      Fundamental Data: Periodic indicators & Instant indicators
      Strategy help • • johback

      4
      1
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      1383
      Views

      V

      @johback

      Hello

      More examples are here https://github.com/quantiacs/toolbox/blob/main/qnt/tests/test_fundamental_data.py

      This is a simple example.

      import qnt.data as qndata import datetime as dt import qnt.data.secgov_indicators import qnt.data as qndata import qnt.stats as qns assets = qndata.stocks.load_ndx_list(tail=dt.timedelta(days=5 * 365)) assets_names = [i["id"] for i in assets] data = qndata.stocks.load_ndx_data(tail=dt.timedelta(days=5 * 365), dims=("time", "field", "asset"), assets=assets_names, forward_order=True) facts_names = ['operating_expense'] # 'assets', 'liabilities', 'ivestment_short_term' and other fundamental_data = qnt.data.secgov_load_indicators(assets, time_coord=data.time, standard_indicators=facts_names) # Operating expenses include marketing, noncapitalized R&D, # travel and entertainment, office supply, rent, salary, cogs... weights = fundamental_data.sel(field='operating_expense') is_liquid = data.sel(field="is_liquid") weights = weights * is_liquid # calc stats stats = qns.calc_stat(data, weights.sel(time=slice("2006-01-01", None))) display(stats.to_pandas().tail()) # graph performance = stats.to_pandas()["equity"] import qnt.graph as qngraph qngraph.make_plot_filled(performance.index, performance, name="PnL (Equity)", type="log")
    • C

      How to load data to work with Multi-backtesting_ml
      Strategy help • • cyan.gloom

      4
      1
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      2112
      Views

      V

      @cyan-gloom

      Hello. The provided code is insufficient to understand the problem.

      I assume that a certain function might not be returning the required value (for instance, the function where your model is being created).

      I recommend that you check all return values of functions, using tools like display or print. Then, compare them with what is returned in properly working examples.

      The state allows you to use data from previous iterations. You can find an example here:
      https://github.com/quantiacs/toolbox/blob/2f4c42e33c7ce789dfad5d170444fd542e28c8ae/qnt/examples/004-strategy-futures-multipass-stateful.py

    • C

      Why Sharp ratios is not inverted ?
      Strategy help • • cyan.gloom

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      2155
      Views

      C

      @support
      Thanks a lot !

    • B

      How to get stocks in SP500 index at a given time
      Support • • buyers_are_back

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      891
      Views

      S

      @buyers_are_back Hi,

      Regarding your first question, yes, that is correct. As we look more into the past, it is more difficult to get data for companies which have been index members but don't exist anymore, for example. This is also related to your second question - symbols with '~1' are in almost all cases, the same companies with the same ticker symbol, but with different ISIN (International Securities Identification Number). For instance, SanDisk company ("NAS:SNDK") was standalone public company until 2016, when Western Digital acquired SanDisk. In 2025 company spinoff, SanDisk re-emerged on the Nasdaq as an independent public company, with the same ticker as it was ('SNDK'), but with different ISIN (considered as different company).
      Those symbol pairs, should not have an intersection in membership ("is_liquid" field should not be 1.0 for both at the same time), otherwise it could be mistake by provider.

    • S

      Q22 submission, strategies excluded
      Support • • Sun-73

      4
      1
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      1302
      Views

      S

      Hi @support, everything is all right now. Thank you!

    • cespadilla

      Question about the Q17 Machine Learning Example Algo
      Strategy help • • cespadilla

      4
      1
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      1326
      Views

      V

      @cespadilla Hello.

      The reason is in "train_model" function.

      def train_model(data): asset_name_all = data.coords['asset'].values features_all = get_features(data) target_all = get_target_classes(data) models = dict() for asset_name in asset_name_all: # drop missing values: target_cur = target_all.sel(asset=asset_name).dropna('time', 'any') features_cur = features_all.sel(asset=asset_name).dropna('time', 'any') target_for_learn_df, feature_for_learn_df = xr.align(target_cur, features_cur, join='inner') if len(features_cur.time) < 10: continue model = get_model() try: model.fit(feature_for_learn_df.values, target_for_learn_df) models[asset_name] = model except: logging.exception('model training failed') return models

      If there are less than 10 features for training the model, then the model is not created (if len(features_cur.time) < 10).

      This condition makes sense. I would not remove it.

      The second thing that can affect is the retraining interval of the model ("retrain_interval").

      weights = qnbt.backtest_ml( train=train_model, predict=predict_weights, train_period=2 *365, # the data length for training in calendar days retrain_interval=10 *365, # how often we have to retrain models (calendar days) retrain_interval_after_submit=1, # how often retrain models after submission during evaluation (calendar days) predict_each_day=False, # Is it necessary to call prediction for every day during backtesting? # Set it to true if you suspect that get_features is looking forward. competition_type='crypto_daily_long_short', # competition type lookback_period=365, # how many calendar days are needed by the predict function to generate the output start_date='2014-01-01', # backtest start date analyze = True, build_plots=True # do you need the chart? )
    • P

      Holding period, execution simulation, feedback from live Quantiacs trading?
      General Discussion • • Penrose-Moore

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      793
      Views

      P

      @support yes coarse heuristics work well as long as you are conservative. For shorter term models I have started using minute bars despite the computational hit, because it helps in a lot of other ways.

      I may enter this contest, I am pretty rusty on predictive modelling and I am not sure I can do a good job using just daily prices, there is not a lot of data. I used to work at a CTA and I feel like we wasted a lot of man years using only prices, hoping better models would acheive more alpha. in the end the sharpe is similar to the S&P but uncorrelated, but you have gotten there with some simpler models and enjoyed life.

      I have some other questions about the platform and the contest that I will post here.

      Best
      P.M.

    • A

      BTC and Crypto contest
      Support • • anthony_m

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      1276
      Views

      A

      @support Ok, I see, thanks

    • X

      allocations and orders
      General Discussion • • xiaolan

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      761
      Views

      support

      @xiaolan Yes, allocations are translate to orders internally, it is enough to check the variation in the allocations and transform it into number of contracts bought/sold. When we designed the toolbox the goal was to simplify development as much as possible for the users.

    • A

      Correlation fails although Sharpe ratio > 1
      Support • • agent.hitmonlee

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      525
      Views

      A

      Thanks for the answer!

      I still think something is wrong with this correlation checker. I even used this function to randomize the weights a few times, and I got the same correlation error:

      def add_random_noise(weights, noise_level=0.01): noise = np.random.uniform(-noise_level, noise_level, size=weights.shape) return weights + noise

      I am pretty sure it's impossible to have 90% correlation in this case.

    • Documentation
    • About
    • Career
    • My account
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Cookies policy
    Home
    Copyright © 2014 - 2026 Quantiacs LLC.
    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors