Navigation

    Quantiacs Community

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • News
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    Correlation fails although Sharpe ratio > 1

    Support
    3
    4
    188
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      agent.hitmonlee last edited by

      I am getting the following warning for my strategy:

      WARNING! This strategy correlates with other strategies and will be rejected.
      Modify the strategy to produce the different output.

      I don't understand what I need to do to get the strategy to "produce the different output". I started from the Ridge Classifier strategy, reused most of the function names, but mine is definitely superior since it yields a better Sharpe ratio.

      What am I doing wrong?

      N support 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • N
        nikjov @agent.hitmonlee last edited by

        This post is deleted!
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • support
          support @agent.hitmonlee last edited by

          @agent-hitmonlee Dear agent-hitmonlee,

          You could have different sharpe ratio, but you must not have same weights for more than 90% of the trading days with any template strategy or any strategy from the past contests. That's how our correlation filter check works.

          Regards

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            agent.hitmonlee last edited by

            Thanks for the answer!

            I still think something is wrong with this correlation checker. I even used this function to randomize the weights a few times, and I got the same correlation error:

            def add_random_noise(weights, noise_level=0.01):
                noise = np.random.uniform(-noise_level, noise_level, size=weights.shape)
                return weights + noise
            

            I am pretty sure it's impossible to have 90% correlation in this case.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
            • Documentation
            • About
            • Career
            • My account
            • Privacy policy
            • Terms and Conditions
            • Cookies policy
            Home
            Copyright © 2014 - 2021 Quantiacs LLC.
            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors