Navigation

    Quantiacs Community

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • News
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    Strategy takes a long time to get verified

    Support
    3
    6
    114
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      magenta.muskrat last edited by

      So I submitted a strategy for the upcoming contest but it's still under verification after 12h...

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        magenta.muskrat @magenta.muskrat last edited by

        @magenta-muskrat Screenshot_2025-08-08-12-05-06-61_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          magenta.muskrat last edited by

          ok, it was rejected ...so the problem is solved 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            Sun-73 @magenta.muskrat last edited by

            Hi @support,

            As the deadline for Q23 approaches, it is expected that new submissions take longer to be processed before being considered to the contest.

            However, I’ve noticed that several recent submissions of mine are usually stucked at 0% of “Checking progress”, and then are suddenly rejected (filtered) due to “Calculation time exceeded”.

            These are simple strategies, based on technical analysis, that are processed quite fast in JupyterLab. Very similar strategies indeed passed the filters and were accepted for the Q23 contest some weeks ago.

            One possible reason is that some users are submitting to the contest much more than 15 strategies (for instance, user “Svyable” has 50 strategies displayed in Q23 Global Leaderboard, instead of the maximum of 15 strategies, as stated in Q23 rules). The system should block an excessive number of submissions in Q23 leaderboard (and limit it to 15 instead to 50).

            Other reason might be the “I use machine learning” option when submitting a strategy, that could allow a “fast-track” submission (more computer processing dedicated to such strategies?), compared to the strategies that do not select this option.

            Could you please check and clarify these issues?

            Thanks!

            support 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • support
              support @Sun-73 last edited by

              Dear @sun-73,

              All strategies that are sent before contest deadline will be processed and eligible for participating in the contest, even if they finish with processing later.

              The limit of 15 strategies per contest remains the same, but that doesn't mean one user can't submit more than 50 strategies. He just has to pick which 15 of them to send to contest, and if he doesn't, then the 15 best sorted by Sharpe ratio will be considered as participating in the contest.

              The strategies of other users, or their number, will not make your strategies exceed limits and filter them out. If you suspect that some strategy shouldn't be filtered out by time limit constraints, you are free to submit the same strategy again. Maybe it will work the next time, and if not, then there is probably some issue with the strategy itself.

              Regards

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                Sun-73 @support last edited by

                @support, thank you for the clarifications. Regards.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                • Documentation
                • About
                • Career
                • My account
                • Privacy policy
                • Terms and Conditions
                • Cookies policy
                Home
                Copyright © 2014 - 2021 Quantiacs LLC.
                Powered by NodeBB | Contributors