Submission failed: what's wrong??
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi all, I'm fairly new just trying to learn. I wanted to submit some test strategy which was all good locally and in the online environment with sr>1 with multipass test. However when I submitted it seemed it was not even executed? Here are the logs (which is obscure tbh) 
  INFO: 2023-09-11T23:35:42Z: pass started: 15136753 
 INFO: 2023-09-11T23:35:44Z: nxt: 2006-01-03T00:00:00Z
 INFO: 2023-09-11T23:35:44Z: next date: 2006-01-03T00:00:00Z
 INFO: 2023-09-11T23:35:47Z: nxt: 2006-01-03T00:00:00Z
 INFO: 2023-09-11T23:35:47Z: next date: 2006-01-03T00:00:00Z
 INFO: 2023-09-12T00:15:45Z: stats received light=false
 INFO: 2023-09-12T00:15:45Z: progress: 0.0
 INFO: 2023-09-12T00:15:45Z: checking: first pass
 INFO: 2023-09-12T00:15:45Z: filter passed: source exists
 INFO: 2023-09-12T00:15:45Z: filter passed: output html exists
 FAIL: 2023-09-12T00:15:45Z: filter failed: output missed
 INFO: 2023-09-12T00:37:46Z: pass completed: 15136753statistics: 
 {"id":14162495,"series":[],"submission_id":"15136749","output_exists":false,"source_exists":true,"last_data":true,"non_liquid":null,"trades_only_btc":null,"output_dates_missed":false,"exposure_check_succeed":null,"ref_output":null,"html_gz":null,"correlated_list":[],"ref_date":1136073600000,"last_date":null,"light":false,"state":null}Can you please help me know what was the issue? 
- 
					
					
					
					
 @buyers_are_back Sorry for the delay, it looks like to problem is the format of the file you are submitting. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi @support , thanks! gonna check the format again when I've got time 
- 
					
					
					
					
 @support I just checked again and saw one of my strategies magically showed up in the "candidates" lol (which was previously in "filtered"). I was totally absent these days and wonder if something has changed? anyway happy that I made the first step. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 @buyers_are_back We reprocessed the submission, it is formally correct and passes all the filters. Sorry for the issue, evidently on our side. 
