Navigation

    Quantiacs Community

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • News
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    Q20 contest results

    News and Feature Releases
    5
    26
    1911
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      dark.pidgeot @support last edited by

      @support I always ask myself the question, when we look at the winners of other competitions, there are some who trade just 5 stocks. can we consider this to be hand-picking?

      support 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        dark.pidgeot @support last edited by

        @support said in Q20 contest results:

        That is also a good observation. In general, we would like a long-only system with low turnover to beat the Nasdaq index for example. But still, we see a lot of problems with hand-picking stocks and survivorship-bias affected systems.

        if I understand correctly

        if I initially select 10 stocks, and even if I have a good sharpe ratio, my strategy can make long and short positions. I could be disqualified

        B support 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          dark.pidgeot @TheFlyingDutchman last edited by

          @theflyingdutchman it seemed to me that strategies should be able to open long and short positions

          support 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            buyers_are_back @dark.pidgeot last edited by buyers_are_back

            @dark-pidgeot said in Q20 contest results:

            @support said in Q20 contest results:

            That is also a good observation. In general, we would like a long-only system with low turnover to beat the Nasdaq index for example. But still, we see a lot of problems with hand-picking stocks and survivorship-bias affected systems.

            if I understand correctly

            if I initially select 10 stocks, and even if I have a good sharpe ratio, my strategy can make long and short positions. I could be disqualified

            That's my understanding too. If you initially select 10 stocks, that already implies survivorship-bias, and is in fact "forward looking" because in for instance year 2010 you could not foresee which 10 stocks would still exist in the index in 2024.

            support 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • support
              support @buyers_are_back last edited by

              @buyers_are_back Yes, that is the forward looking associated to survivorship bias. In order to avoid that, the dataset includes also stocks which were part of the index but have been delisted at some point. These stocks should be taken potentially in consideration by any algorithm, which does not happen by hand-picking stocks.

              One can reverse the logic and conclude the same for stocks which "should" have been shorted in the pasted because of observing an a posteriori delisting.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • support
                support @dark.pidgeot last edited by

                @dark-pidgeot that is fine

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • support
                  support @dark.pidgeot last edited by

                  @dark-pidgeot yes, ybut ou can start from the full index, and selec dynamically 10 according to some criteria, and then take long and short positions.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • support
                    support @dark.pidgeot last edited by

                    @dark-pidgeot It is possible unfortunately, and we are trying to improve the way we detect these potential cases.

                    D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      dark.pidgeot @support last edited by

                      @support Hi,
                      I would like to know how the classification is done in context. you only look at the shape ratio over the out-o-sample period?

                      support 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • support
                        support @dark.pidgeot last edited by

                        @dark-pidgeot sorry for the delay, yes (see answer in other thread)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T
                          TheFlyingDutchman @support last edited by

                          @support: I was wondering if the evaluation period for the Q20 contest has been completed? Has my strategy ML RB 1.2 (#14410209) been approved as a prize winner for Q20? I currently lack some insight into the status of the older strategies, most are stil running, some have been suspended.

                          support 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • support
                            support @TheFlyingDutchman last edited by

                            @theflyingdutchman Hi, the Q20 had very few participants, less than 30, and no strategies are being traded at the moment according to the contest rules. Indeed we made no official announcement.

                            However, the participants had the opportunity to submit the same code (provided it is correct) to the Q21 (in other words no correlations check are performed).

                            It is very cumbersome to remove strategies from the web page, so they are currently displayed.

                            If your strategy will continue to perform good and we believe it can be traded, we will contact you.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                            • Documentation
                            • About
                            • Career
                            • My account
                            • Privacy policy
                            • Terms and Conditions
                            • Cookies policy
                            Home
                            Copyright © 2014 - 2021 Quantiacs LLC.
                            Powered by NodeBB | Contributors