Navigation

    Quantiacs Community

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • News
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All categories
    • Support
    •      Request New Features
    • Strategy help
    • General Discussion
    • News and Feature Releases
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • S

      Issue with the In-sample Sharpe
      Support • • Sun-73

      9
      0
      Votes
      9
      Posts
      1388
      Views

      S

      @support Thank you once again. You guys are the best!

    • S

      Q19 contest
      News and Feature Releases • • Sun-73

      9
      0
      Votes
      9
      Posts
      2453
      Views

      support

      @theflyingdutchman thanks, understood

    • magenta.grimer

      Help in developing a strategy
      Strategy help • • magenta.grimer

      9
      0
      Votes
      9
      Posts
      1721
      Views

      support

      @magenta-grimer Hi, the lookback period in the backtester function is expressed in calendar days, and the indicators are expressed in trading days. So as far as the lookback period is long enough to include all indicator needed periods, all choices are fine.

      If the longest period needed for an indicator is 10 trading days (2 weeks), a lookback period of (for example) 20, 50 or 100 for the backtester function will deliver the same results. The shorter the better for efficiency.

    • C

      Local Development Error "could not convert string to float:'NAS:...'"
      Support • • captain.nidoran

      9
      1
      Votes
      9
      Posts
      2061
      Views

      support

      @captain-nidoran Not fully conclusive yet, please check the related topic:

      https://quantiacs.com/community/topic/249/strategy-optimization-in-local-development-environment-is-not-working/5

    • R

      Cannot Install tookbox.git in colab
      Support • • rubber.trout

      8
      0
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      1152
      Views

      support

      @cyan-gloom Hi, we are busy with checking the submissions which are coming, as we are close to the end of the Q20 contest, sorry if we were not responsive so fast. We will inform as soon as we are ready.

    • T

      Q18 testing
      Support • • TheFlyingDutchman

      8
      0
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      1205
      Views

      E

      @support Thanks a lot!

    • A

      Issue with Future and Crypto Spot data
      Support • • anshul96go

      8
      0
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      1220
      Views

      A

      @support Thanks, mailing you!

    • T

      have q22 allocation earning been sent out?
      Support • • tim-hub

      8
      0
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      3257
      Views

      support

      @lookman The answer we sent to your e-mail address bounced back.

    • magenta.grimer

      Modify an example strategy to trade on the futures market
      Strategy help • • magenta.grimer

      8
      0
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      981
      Views

      magenta.grimer

      @support Thank you very much!

      I hope to don't disturb you so often in the future @support , but before that I need help to "get going".

    • news-quantiacs

      Macroeconomic Data with Quantiacs
      News and Feature Releases • • news-quantiacs

      8
      0
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      7573
      Views

      S

      @antinomy
      Thank you!

    • E

      Checking of strategies for Q20 takes two weeks
      Strategy help • • EDDIEE

      8
      0
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      2103
      Views

      support

      @algotime Dear Algotime, all three strategies will participate in the contest. We will update the contest leaderboard once all eligible strategies have finished processing. Thank you for your patience.

    • A

      External Libraries
      Support • • antinomy

      8
      2
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      2073
      Views

      A

      @support
      Yes, pip is way faster. Thanks!
      I might have found an even faster solution but I guess I have to wait a few hours to find out if it really works.

      Here's what I did:

      I created a folder in /root/books called "modules" to install cvxpy there to make it persistent: !mkdir modules && pip install --target=modules cvxpy Then if the import fails in the strategy, it creates symbolic links in /usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ that point to the content of /root/books/modules/ try: import cvxpy as cp except ImportError: import os source = '/root/book/modules/' target = '/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/' for dirpath, dirnames, filenames in os.walk(source): source_path = dirpath.replace(source, '') target_path = os.path.join(target, source_path) if not os.path.exists(target_path) and not os.path.islink(target_path): os.symlink(dirpath, target_path) continue for file in filenames: source_file = os.path.join(dirpath, file) target_file = os.path.join(target, source_path, file) if not os.path.exists(target_file) and not os.path.islink(target_file): os.symlink(source_file, target_file) import cvxpy as cp

      Creating the symlinks only takes 0.07 seconds, so fingers crossed πŸ™‚

      UPDATE (a few hours later):
      It actually worked. When I just reopened the strategy, the environment was newly initialized. First I tried just importing cvxpy and got the ModuleNotFoundError. Then I ran the strategy including the code above: cvxpy was imported correctly and the strategy ran.

      I'm not sure if that solution works for every module because I don't know if pip might also write something to other directories than site-packages.

      Anyway, I'm happy with this solution.
      Regards

    • A

      Strategy passes correlation check in backtester but fails correlation filter after submission
      Support • • antinomy

      8
      0
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      2035
      Views

      support

      Dear @antinomy,

      There has been some lag in processing, thanks for pointing it out.

      Regards

    • illustrious.felice

      What is forward looking and why it's effective badly to strategy?
      Strategy help • • illustrious.felice

      8
      0
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      2662
      Views

      support

      @illustrious-felice Hi, that is not automatic as all trades are punished by slippage, and that is a subtraction from profits irrespective on the sign of the weights.

    • magenta.grimer

      IP Protection and the ongoing sustainability of the business model
      General Discussion • • magenta.grimer

      8
      3
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      1343
      Views

      support

      @magenta-grimer That is correct, but you can for example train a model locally on your machine, and then submit a code which uses the results of the training (for example stored in numerical form) but does not reveal the underlying idea.

    • M

      Data loading in online Env
      Support • • magenta.kabuto

      8
      0
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      595
      Views

      support

      @magenta-kabuto Hi, did you try it? The slice function is designed to return all weights.

    • news-quantiacs

      Trading Bitcoin on Weekends
      News and Feature Releases • • news-quantiacs

      8
      0
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      1959
      Views

      support

      @sheikh Thank you for the comments.

      The BTC spot we are using are daily data, and open/close/high/low are computed by matching the opening and closing time of the BTC Futures contracts. As we are working with daily resolution, we believe the spot BTC is ok for the current contest. Having the weekend data at disposal, signals can be built by using more information. Moreover, the previous time series were built matching the past spot data with the short futures data.

      This change is not disruptive, as old algorithms developed on the BTC Futures will still run on the BTC Futures. You pointed in another thread the change in the leaderboard: many thanks, please allow us to check and fix it.

      Most of the quants requested this change, so we went for it. Maybe in the future we will allow for both options, but please note that the BTC Futures have a short history, so they will have anyhow to be patched with spot data. Thanks for the suggestion.

    • P

      How to do sliding window of test/train
      Strategy help • • Penrose-Moore

      8
      0
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      845
      Views

      support

      @penrose-moore We finally released a template which allows you to perform a retraining, it is available in the "Examples" section of your private space or publicly in the Documentation:

      https://quantiacs.com/documentation/en/examples/machine_learning_with_a_voting_classifier.html

    • Q

      How to getting start in Quantiacs
      Support • • qida1995

      7
      0
      Votes
      7
      Posts
      1672
      Views

      L

      Hello! Thanks for the link. Of course, this translation gives a better understanding than through Google translator.
      Thank you very much​​​​​​​!

    • M

      WARNING: some dates are missed in the portfolio_history
      Support • • multi_byte.wildebeest

      7
      0
      Votes
      7
      Posts
      898
      Views

      V

      @multi_byte-wildebeest Hi. Without an example, it's unclear what the problem might be.

      If you use a state and a function that returns the prediction for one day, you will not get correct results with precheck.

      This was discussed here: https://quantiacs.com/community/topic/555/access-previous-weights/18

    • Documentation
    • About
    • Career
    • My account
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Cookies policy
    Home
    Copyright Β© 2014 - 2021 Quantiacs LLC.
    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors