Navigation

    Quantiacs Community

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • News
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All categories
    • Support
    •      Request New Features
    • Strategy help
    • General Discussion
    • News and Feature Releases
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • R

      Processing Time
      General Discussion • • rezhak21

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      1116
      Views

      R

      @support ok, thank you!

    • N

      How to submit stateful long short
      Strategy help • • newbiequant96

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      3205
      Views

      support

      @newbiequant96 Hi, the template is a "working code" still to be finalized and published among the templates in the account area, however the logic behind is strictly multi-pass and a conversion to single pass is not really so straightforward.

    • S

      Q22 submission, strategies excluded
      Support • • Sun-73

      4
      1
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      1004
      Views

      S

      Hi @support, everything is all right now. Thank you!

    • E

      Improving Quantiacs: Aligning Developer Objectives with the ones of Quantiacs
      General Discussion • developers improvement quantiacs rankings risk • • EDDIEE

      4
      3
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      1145
      Views

      N

      @eddiee Hi, Mr. Eddie.

      I am new to building strategies using ML/DL on Quantiacs and am very impressed with the OS performance of your ML strategies. I hope you can give me your contact (mail, limkedin,...) so I can learn from your experience in building an ML/DL strategy.

      Sincerely thank.

    • N

      SMA Example
      Support • • Nikos84

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      539
      Views

      N

      @support Thank you!

    • A

      Correlation fails although Sharpe ratio > 1
      Support • • agent.hitmonlee

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      417
      Views

      A

      Thanks for the answer!

      I still think something is wrong with this correlation checker. I even used this function to randomize the weights a few times, and I got the same correlation error:

      def add_random_noise(weights, noise_level=0.01): noise = np.random.uniform(-noise_level, noise_level, size=weights.shape) return weights + noise

      I am pretty sure it's impossible to have 90% correlation in this case.

    • news-quantiacs

      New futures data and next-to-front contracts
      News and Feature Releases • • news-quantiacs

      4
      1
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      744
      Views

      support

      @magenta-grimer Hello, we updated the documentation.

      Now there are 78 futures contracts. Yes, we allow allocating to only 1 asset. If you trade more assets, then you can go long on some of them and short others.

      Using more assets helps in increasing the Sharpe ratio, as the mean return grows linearly with the number of assets, and the volatility in the denominator with the square root of the number of assets if there are no correlation terms.

      Using uncorrelated assets would then lead to a scaling of the Sharpe ratio with the square root of the number of assets. In practice, however, correlation terms are decreasing this growth.

      Stated more simply, it is a good idea to avoid putting all your eggs in the same basket...

    • M

      Why we need to limit the time to process the strategy ?
      Support • • multi_byte.wildebeest

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      617
      Views

      support

      @multi_byte-wildebeest Hi, these limitations refer to the processing time per point in time, not for the full strategy.

      If it takes 10 minutes per historical day, and the simulation has to take into account 250 days for let us say 10 years, the multi-pass simulation would process 6 days per hour, 144 days per real day, that means 2 weeks of processing time for the full submission, it is a lot of time.

    • O

      Can I use astronomical data as features for my machine learning model?
      Support • • omohyoid

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      821
      Views

      O

      @support Thx for ur reply

    • A

      Taking long time and no status update
      Support • • anshul96go

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      908
      Views

      support

      @anshul96go Sorry for the late answer, we missed it somehow. Yes, all submissions sent before deadline will be processed and accepted.

    • M

      Printing training performance of neural network models
      Support • • multi_byte.wildebeest

      4
      1
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      2568
      Views

      V

      @multi_byte-wildebeest Hello. I don't use machine learning models in trading.

    • O

      How long will the submission of a strategy take?
      Support • • omohyoid

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      530
      Views

      support

      Dear @quani42,

      Your submissions are in the queue and will be processed. Also, all submissions that are sent to the contest before the deadline will be eligible to take part in it.

      Regards

    • A

      Jupyter/Jupyter Lab are not working for code editing/running
      Support • • AlgoQuant

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      1056
      Views

      support

      @captain-nidoran Fixed, sorry for issue

    • A

      Unable to see 15/16 of myu strategies
      Support • • anshul96go

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      823
      Views

      support

      @captain-nidoran hi, all your strategies which will take part to the contest should be under the "In Contest" tab in the "Competition" section.

      The migration "Candidates" -> "In Contest" was not immediate as we released minor improvements to the front-end side once the submission phase was over.

    • S

      Stocks strategy
      Strategy help • • spancham

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      854
      Views

      support

      @sheikh Hi, when it comes to stocks and historical simulations, the biggest issue is dealing with survivorship bias. The stock universe must include also stocks which have been delisted and we need to define trading rules which allow for trading instruments which make sense at each point in time. This week we are announing a new contest which is preparing the ground for stocks.

    • E

      Q17 Machine learning - RidgeRegression (Long/Short); there is an error in the code
      Strategy help • • EDDIEE

      4
      1
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      1115
      Views

      E

      @support

      This is a possible fix, but no gurantee. You have to adjust also the prediction function.

      def train_model(data):
      """Create and train the models working on an asset-by-asset basis."""

      models = dict()

      asset_name_all = data.coords['asset'].values

      data = data.sel(time=slice('2013-05-01',None)) # cut the noisy data head before 2013-05-01

      features_all = get_features(data)
      target_all = get_target_classes(data)

      model = create_model()

      for asset_name in asset_name_all:

      # drop missing values: target_cur = target_all.sel(asset=asset_name).dropna('time', 'any') features_cur = features_all.sel(asset=asset_name).dropna('time', 'any') # align features and targets: target_for_learn_df, feature_for_learn_df = xr.align(target_cur, features_cur, join='inner') if len(features_cur.time) < 10: # not enough points for training continue try: model.fit(feature_for_learn_df.values, target_for_learn_df) models[asset_name] = model except KeyboardInterrupt as e: raise e except: logging.exception('model training failed')

      return models

    • magenta.grimer

      Optimizer for simple MA crypto strategy
      Strategy help • • magenta.grimer

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      790
      Views

      A

      There is a way to use the optimizer with a (stateful) mulit pass algo, but depending on the total number of changed parameters it can take a very long time. However, if it runs on a local computer with many workers this can still be useful.

      We could run the backtester with the multi pass algo to get all the weights for the test period and pass these weights to the optimizer.
      There's just one problem with this: you can't pass changed parameters to the strategy using the backtester.
      In order to solve this I created a nested function where the outer function takes the changed parameters from the optimizer. The inner function is the actual multi pass strategy and doesn't define the params but just uses the ones from the outer function. Still within the outer function we run the backtester with one set of params, get the weights it returns and return them to the optimizer.

      The time it takes to run the optimization would roughly be
      (time for 1 multi pass backtest) x (total number of parameter changes) / (number of workers that are able to run)
      So if one multi pass takes 1 minute, you want to optimize 10 parameter changes and can run 5 workers it would take about 2 minutes.

      Here's an example based on the one above with 2 parameter changes and 2 workers:

      import qnt.data as qndata import qnt.ta as qnta import qnt.optimizer as qnop import qnt.backtester as qnbt import xarray as xr def load_data(period): """Loads the BTC Futures data for the BTC Futures contest""" return qndata.cryptofutures.load_data(tail=period, dims=("time", "field", "asset")) def multi_pass_strategy(data, ma_slow_param=50, ma_fast_param=10): """The outer function gets called by the optimizer with changed params, the inner function gets passed to the backtester.""" def strategy(data, state): # The state isn't used in this example, this is just to show that it can be used while optimizing. if state is None: state = 0 state += 1 close = data.sel(field="close") ma_slow = qnta.lwma(close, ma_slow_param).isel(time=-1) ma_fast = qnta.lwma(close, ma_fast_param).isel(time=-1) weights = xr.zeros_like(close.isel(time=-1)) weights[:] = 1 if ma_fast > ma_slow else -1 return weights, state """The backtester returns all weights for the test period which will then be returned to the optimizer""" weights, state = qnbt.backtest( strategy=strategy, competition_type="cryptofutures", load_data=load_data, lookback_period=700, start_date='2014-01-01', build_plots=False, ) return weights data = qndata.cryptofutures.load_data(min_date='2014-01-01') result = qnop.optimize_strategy( data, multi_pass_strategy, qnop.full_range_args_generator( ma_slow_param=range(50, 60, 5), # min, max, step # ma_fast_param=range(5, 100, 5) # min, max, step ), workers=2 # you can set more workers on your PC ) print("---") print("Best iteration:") print(result['best_iteration']) qnop.build_plot(result)

      There might be more efficient ways to do this, so if anyone has one feel free to post it here.

    • S

      Pairs trading with states iterations
      Strategy help • • spancham

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      849
      Views

      S

      @support
      Cool, thanks very much! 👍

    • O

      Where can I get the OHLC data of Nasdaq100 index?
      Support • • omohyoid

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      459
      Views

      O

      @support Thanks for ur help

    • M

      Any updates on the next context?
      News and Feature Releases • • magenta.muskrat

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      1664
      Views

      M

      @support thanks!!!

    • Documentation
    • About
    • Career
    • My account
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Cookies policy
    Home
    Copyright © 2014 - 2021 Quantiacs LLC.
    Powered by NodeBB | Contributors